Falsifiability as a demarcation scale of K. R. Popper
Künye
KAYA, Mustafa (2016). "Falsifiability as a Demarcation Scale of K. R. Popper", Current Topics in Social Sciences, Ed. Hülya Yaldır, Recep Efe, Elzbieta Zuzanska-Zysko, Mehmet Arslan, Sofia: St Kliment Ohridski University Press, pp. 158-171Özet
Popper focuses on that the principle of falsifiability is not linguistic significant
standard, there is a demarcation criterion which is applied on language from a
methodological platform from the outside and he criticises that logical positivists have
attempts to assimilate significance and demarcation criteria which are sourced from that
they make difference between meaning and correctness as indefinite. Lastly, Popper
does not aim at a final refutation of non-scientific view areas and especially metaphysic
in the sense of the demarcation problem, contrastly, he identifies metaphysic as an
auxiliary legal function towards science. Because metaphysic has accompanied with
science on its each process besides that it is a raw material store and method of a prescience
that theories and methods come from it. "Inspiring" role of metaphysic plays
important role on those scientific theories reveal during all of science history.